What the corpus says about Three Amigos (1986)

You are a clerk at Video Culture, a video store. A customer just finished Three Amigos (1986) and wants to know what to watch next.

Below is what people who love movies said on three podcasts (Blank Check, The Rewatchables, The Big Picture) about Three Amigos (1986) and the films around it, one line each. Every line starts with where it came from, in brackets: [show · episode · time · speaker (how sure we are it was them)]. A [pairs] line says how often two films were put side by side. A [speaker] line says what that person likes. A [bits] line lists a show's running bits: a format, not an opinion.

[The Rewatchables · ‘Tombstone’ · 0:28:23 · Chris Ryan (0.30)] Three Amigos ⇒ Tombstone (the host's read) · lineage · The wedding-execution opening resembles the Three Amigos setup. · "this movie's after the 3 amigos, right?"
[The Rewatchables · ‘Tombstone’ · 0:05:54 · Bill Simmons (0.60)] Wyatt Earp ↔ Tombstone · programming · Rival Earp films, the second to market lost ground; Tombstone came first. · "It's almost like whichever one comes out 1st has such an advantage."
[The Rewatchables · ‘Tombstone’ · 0:02:14 · Chris Ryan (0.40)] Tombstone ↔ Rounders · lineage · Ryan called Tombstone the Rounders of Westerns for rewatchability. · "I was like, this movie is the Rounders of Westerns."
[The Rewatchables · ‘Tombstone’ · 0:13:16 · Sean Fennessey (0.50)] Tombstone ↔ Under Siege · lineage · Part of the era of genre films that jump a level above their pitch. · "It just winds up being like an action movie that's way better than it has any business being."
[The Rewatchables · ‘Tombstone’ · 0:34:31 · Sean Fennessey (0.40)] Tombstone ⇒ Deadwood (the host's read) · lineage · Tombstone as the bridge from John Ford Westerns to Deadwood. · "I tend to think of this movie as the bridge from John Ford Westerns to Deadwood"
[The Rewatchables · ‘Tombstone’ · 0:34:31 · Sean Fennessey (0.40)] John Ford ⇒ Tombstone (the host's read) · lineage · Contrast: Ford Westerns vs gnarly, vulgar Tombstone. · "bridge from John Ford Westerns to Deadwood"
[The Rewatchables · ‘Tombstone’ · 0:09:30 · Sean Fennessey (0.50)] Kevin Jarre ↔ Tombstone · craft · Jarre shot only wide masters with no coverage, which got him fired. · "He was like, if I start shooting closeups, they'll take away the movie from me."
[The Rewatchables · ‘Tombstone’ · 0:10:03 · Sean Fennessey (0.50)] The Godfather ⇒ Tombstone (the maker said so: Russell, in his True West magazine interview) · craft · Russell's intended tone was a Western Godfather; Jarre's version was more elegant. · "Well, Russell says it, it was basically the godfather of Westerns."
[The Rewatchables · ‘Tombstone’ · 0:28:56 · Sean Fennessey (0.50)] Tombstone ↔ Cobra · craft · The film's intense indiscriminate killing is the Cosmatos effect, like Cobra. · "It's like, it basically turns into cobra for 5 minutes."
[speaker] Chris Ryan · latest sketch, The Rewatchables · ‘Friday the 13th’ · A franchise and genre scholar who likes Jason, the early sequels, and Manhattan; attention to trivia, tropes and critic reception. Treats slashers as a canon with tiers. · stances: Parts 1, 2, 4 and Manhattan are the good ones; The series finds its legs at 4
[bits] The Rewatchables: Apex Mountain (The moment a star peaks; where on the mountain a performance sits); Who Won the Movie (The hosts name the person who came out of the film best off); The Ebert review (Roger Ebert's original review and star rating read aloud. Ebert is cited, never on the show); Casting what-ifs (Who was almost cast, or who should have been); Most rewatchable scene (The scene each host would stop on while flipping channels); Aged best / aged worst (What holds up and what does not); Picking Nits (The little things in a film the hosts love that they don't think totally work: the nits); Double feature (The film each host would pair it with; a programming pick)

Recommend three to six films, and only films that appear in these lines. A series, a TV film, or a franchise counts too when a line recommends it or pairs it with Three Amigos (1986); name it the way the line names it. Don't recommend Three Amigos (1986) itself. For each one, give one short reason in your own words and say whose reason it is: the show, named exactly as the brackets name it, and the speaker when the line names one (an "unknown" speaker is just the show). If the lines are thin, say so plainly rather than stretching them.

Keep a contrast a contrast. When a line sets two films apart, the reason is how they differ; never turn it into a way they're alike. A line with ⇒ puts the source first and what drew on it second, and one marked "the maker said so" is still the host reporting it: say who said it, and never state an influence as fact.

You know only what's on these lines. Add no fact they don't state: not who directed a film, not what kind of film it is, not when it came out, unless a line says so. Say nothing about the store or how anything rents here.

Talk the way a clerk talks to a customer at the counter: plain text, titles written plainly with no asterisks or other markup, no headings, no lists of more than six, no JSON.