What the corpus says about Pacific Heights (1990)

You are a clerk at Video Culture, a video store. A customer just finished Pacific Heights (1990) and wants to know what to watch next.

Below is what people who love movies said on three podcasts (Blank Check, The Rewatchables, The Big Picture) about Pacific Heights (1990) and the films around it, one line each. Every line starts with where it came from, in brackets: [show · episode · time · speaker (how sure we are it was them)]. A [pairs] line says how often two films were put side by side. A [speaker] line says what that person likes. A [bits] line lists a show's running bits: a format, not an opinion.

[The Rewatchables · ‘What About Bob?’ · 0:46:51 · Sean Fennessey (0.90)] What About Bob? ↔ Pacific Heights · lineage · Sean calls What About Bob? a logical successor to Pacific Heights, part of the late-80s/early-90s 'from hell' subgenre where a transactional acquaintance won't leave your life. · "Think of this movie as a logical successor to Pacific Heights. It is it is the same thing."
[The Rewatchables · ‘The Big Chill’ · 1:20:40 · unknown (0.40)] The Big Chill ↔ Pacific Heights · what-if · A sequel pitch with Meg's son returning is compared to Pacific Heights. · "It's like Pacific Heights."
[The Rewatchables · ‘Domestic Disturbance’ · 0:07:34 · unknown (0.30)] Michael Keaton ↔ Pacific Heights · career · Stars saw villain turns in Pacific Heights and Fatal Attraction as a good career move, which explains why the cycle kept going. · "I think people saw like what happened for Michael Keaton with Pacific Heights and, um, and, like, Glenn Close and Fatal Attraction"
[The Rewatchables · ‘Working Girl’ · 0:20:51 · Bill Simmons (0.50)] Melanie Griffith ↔ Pacific Heights · career · Speakers call Pacific Heights near her peak; Bill likes it. · "Although, if you look at our IMDb, this is probably the peak in Pacific Heights."
[The Rewatchables · ‘The Big Chill’ · 1:48:35 · Bill Simmons (0.40)] Grand Canyon ↔ The Big Chill · programming · Chosen as the best double feature with The Big Chill, though two hosts are mixed on it. · "Grand Canyon, right?"
[The Rewatchables · ‘What About Bob?’ · 1:12:11 · Van Lathan (0.60)] What About Bob? ↔ In Treatment · lineage · A 10-episode remake would be hard; In Treatment is the nearest show, tracking patients over years. · "I mean, in treatment was the show and treatment was kind of sort of like this."
[The Rewatchables · ‘The Big Chill’ · 0:04:50 · unknown (0.40)] The Big Chill ⇒ Beautiful Girls (the host's read) · lineage · Named among the later films that tried and failed to be the Big Chill for a new generation, along with About Alex. · "I remember beautiful girls tried in the mid 90s and there's a movie called About Alex and the mid 2010s."
[The Rewatchables · ‘What About Bob?’ · 1:13:09 · Bill Simmons (0.60)] What About Bob? ↔ Meet the Fockers · lineage · Bill's sequel idea: Analyze That, Meet the Fockers. · "Analyze that, meet the Fokkers."
[The Rewatchables · ‘The Big Chill’ · 0:05:04 · unknown (0.40)] Return of the Secaucus 7 ⇒ The Big Chill (the host's read) · lineage · Called a precursor to The Big Chill. · "precursor to this movie, Socaucus 7 is like this."
[Blank Check · An Angel at My Table · 1:34:07 · unknown (0.30)] What About Bob? ↔ Frank Grimes · theme · Dreyfuss's therapist is likened to Frank Grimes, the lone person who sees the intolerable guy for what he is. · "He's the only one who understands that this person is intolerable."
[The Rewatchables · ‘The Big Chill’ · 0:05:20 · unknown (0.40)] The Big Chill ⇒ 10 Years (the host's read) · lineage · Another reunion-with-a-great-cast attempt that did not match The Big Chill. · "I kind of like 10 years."
[The Rewatchables · ‘What About Bob?’ · 0:17:15 · Sean Fennessey (0.90)] What About Bob? ↔ Analyze This · theme · Both are silly-seeming comedies staffed by hugely accomplished crews, which makes them better. · "a ton of people that are incredibly accomplished working on a movie that seems really silly and it makes the movie that much better."
[The Rewatchables · ‘The Big Chill’ · 0:05:24 · unknown (0.40)] The Big Chill ⇒ The Intervention (the host's read) · lineage · Another indie friends-weekend film in the same vortex. · "There was a movie called The Intervention."
[The Rewatchables · ‘What About Bob?’ · 1:09:39 · Van Lathan (0.60)] What About Bob? ↔ The Bourne Identity · theme · Bob's pretending to be someone else to track the doctor is likened to Jason Bourne or Ethan Hunt spycraft. · "Jason Bourne, like CIA detective skills to go in there and pretend to be somebody else, Ethan Hutt skills"
[The Rewatchables · ‘The Big Chill’ · 1:11:06 · unknown (0.30)] The Big Chill ⇒ Hometown (TV series) (the host's read) · lineage · The Big Chill was adapted as a short-lived 16-episode TV series called Hometown in 1986. · "As the short-lived series hometown?"
[The Rewatchables · ‘What About Bob?’ · 1:16:00 · Bill Simmons (0.70)] What About Bob? ↔ The Good Son · theme · Bill says the lake house is one thing, but the house in The Good Son was probably made up; leads to Culkin evil-kid horror. · "Here's here's where this game ends when you see the house from the good house from the good son."
[The Rewatchables · ‘Friday the 13th’ · 1:15:33 · unknown (0.30)] Friday the 13th ↔ The Big Chill · theme · The pot in the film is called grass; Big Chill and Dazed and Confused are the movies where white people smoke grass. · "You know what movie they smoked grass in?"
[The Rewatchables · ‘What About Bob?’ · 0:35:13 · Sean Fennessey (0.70)] Michael Ballhaus ↔ What About Bob? · craft · Sean says Ballhaus shoots the scene of Siggy scaring Bob like a horror scene, with two heads in the frame, one in back and one in front. · "that's Michael Bauhaus. He's shooting that scene like it's a horror scene, you know, like the 2 heads in the frame, like one in the back and one in the front."
[The Rewatchables · ‘Friday the 13th’ · 1:20:13 · Van Lathan (0.80)] Friday the 13th ↔ The Big Chill · theme · Van's flex: a top five of movies that did not need Black people, with Friday the 13th at number five. · "Number five, Friday the 13th."
[The Rewatchables · ‘What About Bob?’ · 0:45:12 · Van Lathan (0.70)] What About Bob? ↔ National Lampoon's Vacation · craft · Both reflect a time when comedies let protagonists do outrageous things; Clark Griswold kidnaps people at the end of Vacation. · "Well, vacation was like that too. Remember, at the end, Clark Chris, like he kidnaps people."
[speaker] Bill Simmons · latest sketch, The Rewatchables · ‘Friday the 13th’ · Loves the Friday series as a communal, rental-era memory and tells childhood stories about the ads and theaters. Likes casting what-ifs and sports analogies for everything. Skeptical of horror at Christmas and of anything that wastes the premise. · stances: Friday the 13th is not the best entry but the origin story had to be told; Friday 2 is a leap over the original
[speaker] Sean Fennessey · latest sketch, The Big Picture · ‘Resident Evil’ Absolutely Rips! · Loves gory, funny, fast genre movies with craft and confidence, especially 87-minute films that never overstay. Can't stand ponderous elevated horror that fills out its runtime with introspection and sad family history. A sucker for the Carpenter-era lineage, Die Hard homages, and directors who break studio dogma. · stances: Resident Evil is one of the best films of the year; Horror movies have become a drag; fun genre experiences are needed; Short running times are a virtue; Video-game films work best when great filmmakers get creative license
[bits] Blank Check: The box office game (Guessing the film's opening weekend and what it was up against); The sung theme ("Blank Check with Griffin and David", sung; the transcriber garbles it)
[bits] The Rewatchables: Apex Mountain (The moment a star peaks; where on the mountain a performance sits); Who Won the Movie (The hosts name the person who came out of the film best off); The Ebert review (Roger Ebert's original review and star rating read aloud. Ebert is cited, never on the show); Casting what-ifs (Who was almost cast, or who should have been); Most rewatchable scene (The scene each host would stop on while flipping channels); Aged best / aged worst (What holds up and what does not); Picking Nits (The little things in a film the hosts love that they don't think totally work: the nits); Double feature (The film each host would pair it with; a programming pick)

Recommend three to six films, and only films that appear in these lines. A series, a TV film, or a franchise counts too when a line recommends it or pairs it with Pacific Heights (1990); name it the way the line names it. Don't recommend Pacific Heights (1990) itself. For each one, give one short reason in your own words and say whose reason it is: the show, named exactly as the brackets name it, and the speaker when the line names one (an "unknown" speaker is just the show). If the lines are thin, say so plainly rather than stretching them.

Keep a contrast a contrast. When a line sets two films apart, the reason is how they differ; never turn it into a way they're alike. A line with ⇒ puts the source first and what drew on it second, and one marked "the maker said so" is still the host reporting it: say who said it, and never state an influence as fact.

You know only what's on these lines. Add no fact they don't state: not who directed a film, not what kind of film it is, not when it came out, unless a line says so. Say nothing about the store or how anything rents here.

Talk the way a clerk talks to a customer at the counter: plain text, titles written plainly with no asterisks or other markup, no headings, no lists of more than six, no JSON.