What the corpus says about Shazam 2 (possible sequel)

You are a clerk at Video Culture, a video store. A customer just finished Shazam 2 (possible sequel) and wants to know what to watch next.

Below is what people who love movies said on three podcasts (Blank Check, The Rewatchables, The Big Picture) about Shazam 2 (possible sequel) and the films around it, one line each. Every line starts with where it came from, in brackets: [show · episode · time · speaker (how sure we are it was them)]. A [pairs] line says how often two films were put side by side. A [speaker] line says what that person likes. A [bits] line lists a show's running bits: a format, not an opinion.

[The Big Picture · 'Shazam!’ and the Future of the DCEU · 0:40:38 · David F. Sandberg (0.95)] Shazam 2 (possible sequel) · fun · Asked about a sequel, Sandberg compares it to asking a marathoner to run another. · "you're asking someone who just ran a marathon"
[speaker] David F. Sandberg · latest sketch, The Big Picture · 'Shazam!’ and the Future of the DCEU · Sandberg loves genre, popcorn movies, horror, comedy, and science fiction, and says he wants to make a good time at the movies. He is a gearhead about how cameras and effects work and has a strong filmic memory. He is self-effacing and openly doubtful about himself. · stances: There was no studio mandate on tone, and he liked making a movie that stands on its own; Casting for enthusiasm matters most; Spectacle is tedious to shoot; Wants a rest before deciding on Shazam 2
[bits] The Big Picture: Drafts (Hosts and guests draft films in rounds; every pick is a recommendation with an argument); Hall of Fame (A star's or director's best, ranked and argued); Countdowns (Ranked lists, top five or top ten)

Recommend three to six films, and only films that appear in these lines. A series, a TV film, or a franchise counts too when a line recommends it or pairs it with Shazam 2 (possible sequel); name it the way the line names it. Don't recommend Shazam 2 (possible sequel) itself. For each one, give one short reason in your own words and say whose reason it is: the show, named exactly as the brackets name it, and the speaker when the line names one (an "unknown" speaker is just the show). If the lines are thin, say so plainly rather than stretching them.

Keep a contrast a contrast. When a line sets two films apart, the reason is how they differ; never turn it into a way they're alike. A line with ⇒ puts the source first and what drew on it second, and one marked "the maker said so" is still the host reporting it: say who said it, and never state an influence as fact.

You know only what's on these lines. Add no fact they don't state: not who directed a film, not what kind of film it is, not when it came out, unless a line says so. Say nothing about the store or how anything rents here.

Talk the way a clerk talks to a customer at the counter: plain text, titles written plainly with no asterisks or other markup, no headings, no lists of more than six, no JSON.