What the corpus says about The Outsiders (1983)

You are a clerk at Video Culture, a video store. A customer just finished The Outsiders (1983) and wants to know what to watch next.

Below is what people who love movies said on three podcasts (Blank Check, The Rewatchables, The Big Picture) about The Outsiders (1983) and the films around it, one line each. Every line starts with where it came from, in brackets: [show · episode · time · speaker (how sure we are it was them)]. A [pairs] line says how often two films were put side by side. A [speaker] line says what that person likes. A [bits] line lists a show's running bits: a format, not an opinion.

[Blank Check · As Good as It Gets · 1:50:00 · Chris Gethard (0.80)] Breaking Away ↔ The Outsiders · programming · Chris watched both for the first time back to back on planes. · "Yeah, I watched that and the outsiders back to back on planes."
[The Rewatchables · 'Mission: Impossible' · 0:40:39 · Jason Concepcion (0.30)] Emilio Estevez ↔ The Outsiders · people · Estevez was in The Outsiders alongside Cruise, and he never again appeared in a blockbuster ensemble. · "the outsiders? Like, this is, it's just really, that Tom Cruise was also in"
[The Rewatchables · ‘The Big Chill’ · 0:38:39 · unknown (0.40)] Breaking Away ↔ American Flyers · programming · Cycling month for the show: American Flyers and Breaking Away. · "Maybe we should do cycling month on the rewatchable."
[speaker] Chris Gethard · latest sketch, Blank Check · As Good as It Gets · Loves an unapologetic dickhead performance and Star Wars minutiae (memorized the encyclopedia in high school); a sucker for Helen Hunt and for underdog films like Breaking Away. Can't stand Poe Dameron's mutiny, bad-movie-in-theaters stories, or romances where a straight man and woman can't just respect each other. · stances: Kinnear's performance is the best in the film and may be his career peak; Poe Dameron is a war criminal; Wants straight male/female friendships that stay non-romantic; Nicholson in this film is top three for lovable dickheads
[speaker] Jason Concepcion · latest sketch, The Big Picture · Did Disney’s ‘Mulan’ Experiment Work? A Binge Mode Investigation · Loves a musical, Donnie Yen action, and the 1998 Mulan with its Eddie Murphy humor. Finds the remake kind of boring and wants a grounded, historical version. Sucker for political and economic framing of film controversy. · stances: The remake is fine in a vacuum, a disappointment as a Mulan; Wants a more historical, less magical take; Sees the Mulan controversy as a symptom of the West-China economic experiment; Missing music means missing storytelling
[bits] Blank Check: The box office game (Guessing the film's opening weekend and what it was up against); The sung theme ("Blank Check with Griffin and David", sung; the transcriber garbles it)
[bits] The Rewatchables: Apex Mountain (The moment a star peaks; where on the mountain a performance sits); Who Won the Movie (The hosts name the person who came out of the film best off); The Ebert review (Roger Ebert's original review and star rating read aloud. Ebert is cited, never on the show); Casting what-ifs (Who was almost cast, or who should have been); Most rewatchable scene (The scene each host would stop on while flipping channels); Aged best / aged worst (What holds up and what does not); Picking Nits (The little things in a film the hosts love that they don't think totally work: the nits); Double feature (The film each host would pair it with; a programming pick)

Recommend three to six films, and only films that appear in these lines. A series, a TV film, or a franchise counts too when a line recommends it or pairs it with The Outsiders (1983); name it the way the line names it. Don't recommend The Outsiders (1983) itself. For each one, give one short reason in your own words and say whose reason it is: the show, named exactly as the brackets name it, and the speaker when the line names one (an "unknown" speaker is just the show). If the lines are thin, say so plainly rather than stretching them.

Keep a contrast a contrast. When a line sets two films apart, the reason is how they differ; never turn it into a way they're alike. A line with ⇒ puts the source first and what drew on it second, and one marked "the maker said so" is still the host reporting it: say who said it, and never state an influence as fact.

You know only what's on these lines. Add no fact they don't state: not who directed a film, not what kind of film it is, not when it came out, unless a line says so. Say nothing about the store or how anything rents here.

Talk the way a clerk talks to a customer at the counter: plain text, titles written plainly with no asterisks or other markup, no headings, no lists of more than six, no JSON.